Market Signals or Spectacle? January was a reminder that this market has become unusually good at separating signal from spectacle.
The headlines were loud: tariff threats tied to Greenland, renewed questions around Federal Reserve independence, sharp one-day selloffs—and just as sharp reversals. Yet by month’s end, equities were still near record territory, leadership remained intact, and volatility failed to stick.
That contrast tells the story. Investors are no longer reacting reflexively to political noise. Instead, they are focused on whether headlines interfere with rates, earnings, or capital flows. When they don’t, selloffs tend to fade quickly.
The headlines were loud: tariff threats tied to Greenland, renewed questions around Federal Reserve independence, sharp one-day selloffs—and just as sharp reversals. Yet by month’s end, equities were still near record territory, leadership remained intact, and volatility failed to stick.
That contrast tells the story. Investors are no longer reacting reflexively to political noise. Instead, they are focused on whether headlines interfere with rates, earnings, or capital flows. When they don’t, selloffs tend to fade quickly.
Meanwhile, the market’s familiar pillars held. Earnings season began with resilience rather than fireworks. AI spending remained robust, though no longer unquestioned. And the Federal Reserve reinforced that policy is no longer the market’s tailwind—but not yet its headwind.
The Fed: New Chair
President Trump said this morning that he will nominate Kevin Warsh to be the next chair of the Fed. Warsh would replace Jerome Powell when his term expires in May. The appointment, which requires Senate confirmation, amounts to a return trip for Warsh, who was a member of the Fed’s board from 2006 to 2011.
The selection was likely to ease concern about Fed independence. While Warsh is expected to push for lower rates in the short term, the financial markets view him as someone who wouldn’t always follow the president’s direction and, importantly, maintain credibility for monetary policy.
In other news, and separate from the leadership change, the Federal Reserve under current chair Jerome Powell held its policy rate steady at 3.5%–3.75% in late January, signaling patience rather than urgency. Growth remains firm. Inflation is improving, but uneven. And the labor market is stable enough to give policymakers time.
Earnings: Still the Adult in the Room
As earnings season ramps, tolerance for disappointment looks thin. With valuations elevated, results matter more than narratives.
Just yesterday, Facebook parent Meta’s strong outlook reinforced the bullish case for sustained capital investment in AI. At the same time, Microsoft’s slowing cloud growth and margin pressure triggered sharp declines across software stocks, pushing parts of the sector into bear-market territory.
AI is still lifting the market—but it is also testing it, with investors increasingly focused on returns rather than promises.
Going Forward
And a reminder from Fundstrat’s Tom Lee, who said as much in December but further elaborated just three days ago on CNBC:
“I think 2026 has the same contours as last year. 2026 is a good fundamental earnings story. But we have two transitions to deal with: one is a new Fed Chair – the market always tests a new Fed Chair. That’s one source of a drawdown. The second is policy... [and the] uncertainty around tariffs. Last year, that was enough to drive a 20% decline in the S&P 500.”
That said, Lee continues to believe the market ends the year higher.
Bottom line
January didn’t change the market’s narrative—but it sharpened its edges.
This remains a market supported by earnings, durable AI investment, and a Federal Reserve that can afford to wait. At the same time, valuations leave little room for error. A time to stay invested, but not over your skis.
And For What It’s Worth…
As reported by The Times, the Bank of England has been urged to plan for a financial crisis sparked by aliens.
Helen McCaw, a former senior analyst in financial security at the UK’s central bank, has written to the Bank’s governor urging him to organize contingencies for the possibility that the White House may one day confirm we are not alone in the universe. McCaw, a Cambridge graduate, believes a declaration of that magnitude would send shockwaves through the markets and could trigger bank collapses and civil unrest.
Highly unlikely? Sure. But if it ever happened, it would turn spectacle into signal in a hurry.
_____
As noted before, long term, the strategies will get the trends right. Short term, there may be a miss or two as the market juggles conflicting signals. So keep allocations of strategies reasonable within your portfolio, and remember that protection remains paramount.
--David
The Fed: New Chair
President Trump said this morning that he will nominate Kevin Warsh to be the next chair of the Fed. Warsh would replace Jerome Powell when his term expires in May. The appointment, which requires Senate confirmation, amounts to a return trip for Warsh, who was a member of the Fed’s board from 2006 to 2011.
The selection was likely to ease concern about Fed independence. While Warsh is expected to push for lower rates in the short term, the financial markets view him as someone who wouldn’t always follow the president’s direction and, importantly, maintain credibility for monetary policy.
In other news, and separate from the leadership change, the Federal Reserve under current chair Jerome Powell held its policy rate steady at 3.5%–3.75% in late January, signaling patience rather than urgency. Growth remains firm. Inflation is improving, but uneven. And the labor market is stable enough to give policymakers time.
Earnings: Still the Adult in the Room
As earnings season ramps, tolerance for disappointment looks thin. With valuations elevated, results matter more than narratives.
Just yesterday, Facebook parent Meta’s strong outlook reinforced the bullish case for sustained capital investment in AI. At the same time, Microsoft’s slowing cloud growth and margin pressure triggered sharp declines across software stocks, pushing parts of the sector into bear-market territory.
AI is still lifting the market—but it is also testing it, with investors increasingly focused on returns rather than promises.
Going Forward
- Best case: Earnings growth remains the primary driver. AI spending continues, but leadership becomes more selective. Markets grind higher, with volatility concentrated around data and earnings—not headlines.
- Wild cards: Tariff uncertainty, including the looming SCOTUS decision, and Fed credibility - not so much from policy decisions as from perceptions of independence and continuity.
And a reminder from Fundstrat’s Tom Lee, who said as much in December but further elaborated just three days ago on CNBC:
“I think 2026 has the same contours as last year. 2026 is a good fundamental earnings story. But we have two transitions to deal with: one is a new Fed Chair – the market always tests a new Fed Chair. That’s one source of a drawdown. The second is policy... [and the] uncertainty around tariffs. Last year, that was enough to drive a 20% decline in the S&P 500.”
That said, Lee continues to believe the market ends the year higher.
Bottom line
January didn’t change the market’s narrative—but it sharpened its edges.
This remains a market supported by earnings, durable AI investment, and a Federal Reserve that can afford to wait. At the same time, valuations leave little room for error. A time to stay invested, but not over your skis.
And For What It’s Worth…
As reported by The Times, the Bank of England has been urged to plan for a financial crisis sparked by aliens.
Helen McCaw, a former senior analyst in financial security at the UK’s central bank, has written to the Bank’s governor urging him to organize contingencies for the possibility that the White House may one day confirm we are not alone in the universe. McCaw, a Cambridge graduate, believes a declaration of that magnitude would send shockwaves through the markets and could trigger bank collapses and civil unrest.
Highly unlikely? Sure. But if it ever happened, it would turn spectacle into signal in a hurry.
_____
As noted before, long term, the strategies will get the trends right. Short term, there may be a miss or two as the market juggles conflicting signals. So keep allocations of strategies reasonable within your portfolio, and remember that protection remains paramount.
--David
RSS Feed